Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE002 - User reviews

Sort:
Darek
5.0
Said great tire for dry and in the wet. Begins aggressive compared to my previous ContiSportContact 3 is a fairy tale, very sudden braking stick with a little less, but certainly better than SCC 3, driving the highway from the high speed is a pleasure. The tire has a very hard wall side. The rubber on the tread seems sweet but not too comfortable on Polish roads cracked. In the middle of the car seems to be difficult. This is the ideal tire for everyday driving fast cars for strong sports or sport.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:only in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:Honda Civic Hatchback VIII 2.0 Type-R
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5.0
The grip on wet surface5.0
Driving comfort
Noise level4.2
Bump absorption3.4
Other
Tyre appearance5.0
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4.7
Feathering, durability5.0
Mondeo70235
4.9
Welcome. I highly recommend the anvil based its Mondeo ST 224HP 2.2. Cool guard, good donuts cornering grip, pulling away from the crossing of a large, quiet at high speeds, water resistant. Highly recommended - an aggressive tread design, large autku looks.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:only in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Ford Mondeo Kombi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5.0
The grip on wet surface4.8
Driving comfort
Noise level5.0
Bump absorption5.0
Other
Tyre appearance5.0
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy5.0
Feathering, durability5.0
marcin90bdg
4.9
Large tires for driving. Well stick to ba road in wet and dry cornering feel that the suspension has reached the margin of a tire is still holding. I have a car 200 horsepower and rubber 4 and I am very happy.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:only in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:Mercedes CLK Coupe
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4.8
The grip on wet surface5.0
Driving comfort
Noise level4.2
Bump absorption4.2
Other
Tyre appearance5.0
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3.2
Feathering, durability2.6
Zibi
4.8
Tires beautifully presented, maneuverability, excellent car works very reliable and stable. No problems with braking or leaving. Certainly recommendable.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000km
Place of use:only in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Ford Mondeo 4/5 drzwi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5.0
The grip on wet surface4.7
Driving comfort
Noise level5.0
Bump absorption5.0
Other
Tyre appearance5.0
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy5.0
Feathering, durability5.0
Jacob
4.6
I wouldn't advise buying Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE002 any regular commuters. It is the tyre that has a lot of potential and It can only spread it's wings in a hand and feet of experienced drivers. It performs best when it's properly heated. My car is 240 HP Subaru Impreza and the first impression after fitting them was not so good. I had to visit a race track to become fully acquainted with them. After third lap the tyres were sticking to the tarmac like mad. Every lap I managed to do nearly 20 mph faster then on my old Continentals. And you need to know that Bridgestones are even cheaper. They are some cons which is obvious. In can't be the best in every aspect. For example Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE002 is a bit louder and it wears out bit quicker.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:Subaru Impreza Sedan I 2.0i
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5.0
The grip on wet surface4.2
Driving comfort
Noise level1.8
Bump absorption4.2
Other
Tyre appearance-
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3.2
Feathering, durability2.6
Mike
4.6
My car is tweaked up to 200 HP and 400 NM diesel. Previosly I owned Dunlops SPSports01, and the dumping on potholes was better but the rest is better on Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE002. Traction on dry roads is astonishing! In the same conditions Dunlops were squeaking are starting to loose grip. The Bridgestones provide full grip and traction on every gear. Sprints from 0-60 are their distinct asset. Potenzas let me achieve 6,8 sec to 60 in comparison to 7,3 on Sp Sports! The difference in enormous. I can skip the fact of sticking to the road on dry and when cornering fast like being glued on Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE002. The tread pattern is also cool. If you like dynamic driving, fast accelerations and a bit of adrenaline than this tyre will be the perfect choice for you.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:Alfa Romeo 147 Hatchback I 1.9 JTDM 16V (103kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5.0
The grip on wet surface4.2
Driving comfort
Noise level4.2
Bump absorption3.4
Other
Tyre appearance5.0
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4.2
Feathering, durability-
Luke
4.6
I own Ford Mondeo MK4 estate and I have to state with regrets that Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE002 is not the most comfortable tyre I have used till now. The tyres are bit to hard and it influences the job that suspension has to do. Even lower pressure around 2.2 isn't helpfull. Goodyears I had before where more comfortable. I bought those tyres I a size recommended by my car manufacturer which is 215/55R16 and they look bit like balloons. I can't argue with the fact that tkanks to this shape they protect the rim from curbs and scratches but the looks are also important to some people. Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE002 is perfect to use with low profile tyres. These were the only cons that I could find. From the site of the pros I can admit that they stick to the road as they were glued. The car reacts instantly for any direction change. Handling is confident, the car is more nimble then before. I felt it from the first miles. The ABS has never interven despite my few emergency breakings from 90 mph. In my opinion Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE002 represents the highest safety level. I recommend those tyres for big wheel sets in sport cars. To people that value comfort I advise to choose other models.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Ford Mondeo Kombi IV 2.0
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5.0
The grip on wet surface4.2
Driving comfort
Noise level4.2
Bump absorption2.6
Other
Tyre appearance3.4
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4.2
Feathering, durability-
Robert
4.6
I drove to the Bridgestone ER300 factory, but failed. I changed Potenza adrenaline. Auto performed better on them, but are probably a little stronger. I think it is best to keep the wet recommended!

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Peugeot 207 SW Outdoor
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5.0
The grip on wet surface4.2
Driving comfort
Noise level3.4
Bump absorption4.2
Other
Tyre appearance4.2
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3.4
Feathering, durability-
Wojtek BTM
4.6
I bought it at the beginning of the season, led 12000 km. Well behave the way. Cornering, braking and acceleration on dry and wet roads. The only downside is riding in the rain or riding in the pool deep ruts. Feel the water under the tire and the need for more driving confidence. Previously used a Marangioni Zeta tire tread V-shaped Linea and riding in the rain was more reliable. However, all other properties far better than "Adrenalince"

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Mazda 626 4/5 drzwi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5.0
The grip on wet surface4.2
Driving comfort
Noise level2.6
Bump absorption3.4
Other
Tyre appearance4.2
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3.4
Feathering, durability3.4
AlexMil
4.5
Grand dry air, is like driving on the slopes and offers good progression in turns. Maintains control of the car in case of emergency on the road is higher than the speed in the streets of the city now claimed dozens of round ... They allow you to have fun in the mountain trails. As surprising as the performance in the wet: aquaplaning nonexistent until a moderate speed, cornering very well maintains its grip. Excellent noise, is silent after the first 500 km. Fuel consumption is in line with the tires that I mounted above (Continental SportContact2), I experienced an increase in the average fuel consumption of 0.2l / 100km

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:Opel Astra Hatchback J 2.0 CDTI (121kW) (5/115)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5.0
The grip on wet surface4.0
Driving comfort
Noise level5.0
Bump absorption4.0
Other
Tyre appearance5.0
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3.4
Feathering, durability3.0
Total rating of the tyre
4.4
4.2
4.4
-
4.0