Dunlop Grandtrek AT3 - User reviews

  • 1
  • 2
Sort:
Riken03
4.2
I was driving on the more than 13,000 tires. km. The tires are really strong, they look good, not good in the middle, even after the rains. Unfortunately, when we will stay mainly asphalt charm is broken. The hard tire, resistance to high turnover compared to winter tires when the cube is burning higher by about 1.5 l / 100 km.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Toyota RAV4 SUV III 2.0 VVT-i
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4.2
The grip on wet surface4.2
Driving comfort
Noise level1.0
Bump absorption3.4
Other
Tyre appearance5.0
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3.4
Feathering, durability4.2
Grzegorz
4.2
Versatile tire. Should not be quieter, but it certainly makes up for the driving conditions.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:Honda CR-V II 2.0
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4.2
The grip on wet surface4.2
Driving comfort
Noise level2.6
Bump absorption4.2
Other
Tyre appearance5.0
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3.9
Feathering, durability4.2
Krzysztof K
4.0
Hello, tires seemed to be the best compromise, but ... Well, just after line 10 000 km downloaded for winter, after re wyząbkowały out that the tires "tall, the tire ran for one season and, principle, not suitable for further use. With slow driving on asphalt, they seem such a blow that I wondered if my car breaks down. For the curious, just before the foundation of the repaired tire and suspension set convergence.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Mitsubishi Outlander SUV I 2.0 4WD
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4.2
The grip on wet surface4.2
Driving comfort
Noise level1.0
Bump absorption2.6
Other
Tyre appearance4.2
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy1.8
Feathering, durability1.0
mirales
3.2
Confirm with minimal wear loud I do not know what! Consumption on the normative side of the tire. Teeth, despite the new suspension system. Dud! No liability or warranty. After 20 000 thousand euros. you can not go! The manufacturer says it should be!

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:only outside the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:Honda CR-V IV 2.2 CDTi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3.4
The grip on wet surface2.9
Driving comfort
Noise level1.0
Bump absorption2.6
Other
Tyre appearance5.0
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy1.3
Feathering, durability1.0
LUK
3.1
The tire is suitable only in the area. On the asphalt road, they are very noisy, not for the road or city. Tires are like new subtitles, very decent white fine on the side. However, when you use people rather careless ride on the sidewalk tires can destroy protruding white subtitles (it looks terrible that later). Personally, I would not buy (I have as a gift :-) do not look a gift horse in the mouth).

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Hyundai
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:-

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface2.6
The grip on wet surface1.8
Driving comfort
Noise level1.0
Bump absorption2.6
Other
Tyre appearance4.2
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy2.3
Feathering, durability2.6
  • 1
  • 2
Total rating of the tyre
3.8
3.6
4.0
-
3.4