Opening
and closing this menu:
Ctrl
+
M
Go to main menu
Go to footer
Go to sitemap
Check order status
01 699 4151
01 699 4151
Today:
7 till 19
Click if you
live in UK
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Snow chains
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Michelin Tyres
Bridgestone Tyres
Continental Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
TPMS pressure sensors
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Contrast
Oponeo
Rating and Reviews
Tyre Reviews Goodyear Vector 4Seasons
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons - User reviews
10
11
12
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
Michał
3.6
A good compromise. The savings in seasonal exchange of tires, which are no longer needed.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Honda FR-V Van I 2.2 CDTi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
-
A.P.
3.6
Happy for service, good practice, good tires.
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000km
Place of use:
in terrain + in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Mercedes E-Class Sedan W211 200 Kompressor
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Syed
3.5
I drive around Skye on tires for almost 6 months now. I mostly travel between city and I am really happy with these tires.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Renault Laguna Estate II 2.0 16V (5/108)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
czwarty78
3.4
If you drive quietly tires are superb - no need to visit the vulcanization each semester and impeccable grip
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
VW Sharan Van I 1.9 TDI
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
Yes
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
chi-ha
3.3
A bit slippery in the wet, but it will give you advice, I'm waiting for the winter and see.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Renault Thalia Sedan I 1.5 dCi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
5
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
5
Feathering, durability
5
r
3.3
So far, the tires properly manage there is no objection, but only in winter pass the test, then you'll be able to comment on the advantages and disadvantages of these tires.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Tomas125
5.0
Tyres: Vredestein Quatrac 3 <> Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons. I have driven around 6,000 km on Vredestein Quatrac 3 tyres, a front-wheel drive Peugeot 206, and around 60,000 km on Goodyear Vector 4Seasons tyres. My comments on the Vredestein Quatrac 3 compared with the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons - Vredestein rubber compound: softer, softer - the tyres are a little too flexible; this makes the car unstable when accelerating and at speeds above 80 km/h (temperatures above 25 C) the car drifts left or right - which reduces safety. However, in the case of potholes, bumps are better absorbed compared with Goodyear tyres due to their high elasticity; - Rolling noise is lower (around 68 dB) compared with Goodyear tyres (71 dB): In my experience, Vredestein tyres make more noise because of the cross sipes - which is very annoying (the tyres act a bit like a sound box, for example for a guitar - you can hear the noise amplified by the tyre walls filled with air/nitrogen); it's a bit like driving a tractor. The rolling resistance of the Vredestein Quatrac 3 is considerably higher compared to the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons (the car drives more slowly - up to maximum speed, accelerates more slowly); I would say that fuel consumption is about 0.5 litres more per 100 km); - The Vredestein Quatrac 3 has poorer water dispersal characteristics (slower / less efficient) compared to the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons. Many users ;rate these tyres slightly better than Goodyear, but in my experience the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons are better (especially in terms of driving comfort).
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
only in the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
Peugeot 206 Hatchback I 1.4
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
5
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
5
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
5
Feathering, durability
5
Tomas125
5.0
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons tyres - I traveled about 60,000 km in summer (over 32 ° C) and in winter (frost, snow and ice) - they perform great; I have a comparison to Pirelli (summer) and Barum (winter) - a very big improvement in the quality and comfort of driving compared to the above tyres; great softness on the holes - high damping on the bumps, very high rolling comfort - the car began to drive like a limousine; I did not suspect that the quality of the tyre had such a significant impact; rolling noise - clearly less than previously used tyres - these are also low-noise Goodyears; you can hear the rolling noise - not the noise of the transverse sipes - the V-shaped tread is slanting, which results in low noise; the disadvantage of the V shape is poor drift at high corners at high speed; tyres stick very well to the surface - sharp braking - the car stops almost "in place" (I had to brake suddenly 3 times). I recommend this excellent product. Now I will try to put on the front wheels (drive) the Vredestein Quatrac 3 tyres because they have the same labels: "E" and "C" (braking) and a similar volume of 68/69 dB - but a different tread shape - on the front axle should not endure when sharp turns. Practice - it will show what these tyres are worth. I will leave Goodyears Vector on the rear axle.
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
only in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Peugeot 206 Hatchback I 1.4
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
5
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
5
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
5
Feathering, durability
5
kostuch
4.9
I had all previously separate summer and winter. I changed because I have no where to keep extra set and I am very happy. Tires hold great both on the snow in winter and in summer on dry asphalt. Each year, to about 20,000 km, and the tires are 1.5 years. I urge all those who do not competition ;)
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain + in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Toyota Corolla 3/4/5 drzwi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
5
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
5
Other
Tyre appearance
5
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
5
Feathering, durability
5
Big steve
4.8
I am coming up to renewing these tyres as ther is only 2mm of tread left on the front they have completed 33000 miles the grip outstanding in the wet mud and snow in the dry just brilliant. I have never really had a bad tyre but then I have always had the same tyres On all 4 wheels the tyre has worn really well but most of the time it is the cars suspension and tracking set up that causes poor wear the tyre is very much part on the suspension on a vehicle anyway it all has to work together Manufactors of vehicles test their cars on a brand to get the best the owner changes the tyre for cheapness or look not the functional side these are not the best tyre to have their is no such thing it depends on your vehicle and you the driver my history I have raced and rallied car now I work ford Mercedes Benz as a Vehicle technician these tyre are the best around tyre
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain + outside the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
Ford Focus Hatchback II 1.8 TDCi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
5
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
-
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
10
11
12
Total rating of the tyre
4.2
Comfort
4.2
Road
4.3
Off-road
-
Cost
4.2
Buy