Opening
and closing this menu:
Ctrl
+
M
Go to main menu
Go to footer
Go to sitemap
Check order status
01 699 4151
01 699 4151
Phones off
Click if you
live in UK
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Snow chains
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Michelin Tyres
Bridgestone Tyres
Continental Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
TPMS pressure sensors
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Contrast
Oponeo
Rating and Reviews
Tyre Reviews Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 K120
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 K120 - User reviews
12
13
14
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
AngryMan
2.9
These tyres have only covered 26000kms, which is half of what each of Dunlop SP2030 as OE on car as new and Contiental Sport Contact 5 as second set did. I have size 225/45r18 for Mazda 6 2012 which is used by my wife for normal, daily driving on highways. If you want to save 20.00 Euro then go ahead and get Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 K120, but it will cost you in the long run, because you will need to replace them in half the time as other best brands. I honestly thought that being listed by Oponeo as a premium brand tyre, it would be a good product, guess not so much. The tread wear is totally uneven as the channels are all different now, and the pressure was maintained at 32PSI and checked every two weeks. I think it’s time to relegate this tyre to medium class tyres. Stay away! - is my opinion and spend €20.00 to € 140.00 more to save yourselves time and money and grief afterwards.
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
only outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Mazda 6 Sedan III 2.2 SKYACTIV-D (110kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
2
Feathering, durability
1
krzysiek raba
2.1
Recommended fresh tires. after driving 400 kilometers an asshole me two pieces pierced through what I had to buy another two
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
VW Passat Sedan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
1
The grip on wet surface
1
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
4
Jan Kowalski
2.0
Hi. As I wrote earlier I do not recommend these tyres or the company. Tyres after one season get vibrations that can fall out of the seat and the company insists that the tyres are suitable for driving, You decide for yourselves what to choose. After testing and examination, the tyre is within the norm, i.e. RFV= 6kg and, by comparison, the permissible RFV=14. I do not know if I could drive with such a beating on the steering wheel. The suspension is not worth it.
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Audi A6 Avant C6 2.0 TDI (89kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3
The grip on wet surface
2
Driving comfort
Noise level
1
Bump absorption
1
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
Yes
Economy
Economy
-
Feathering, durability
-
12
13
14
Total rating of the tyre
4.4
Comfort
4.1
Road
4.5
Off-road
-
Cost
4.0
Buy