Opening
and closing this menu:
Ctrl
+
M
Go to main menu
Go to footer
Go to sitemap
Check order status
01 699 4151
01 699 4151
Today:
7 till 19
Click if you
live in UK
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Snow chains
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Michelin Tyres
Bridgestone Tyres
Continental Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
TPMS pressure sensors
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Contrast
Oponeo
Rating and Reviews
Tyre Reviews Bridgestone ER300
Bridgestone ER300 - User reviews
23
24
25
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
SEBASTIAN
3.8
I am very happy with my purchase over Randy, there was a problem with wheel balancing, they almost do not hear well and pretty. I was already a different product, but turned out to be hopeless
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4.2
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4.2
Bump absorption
4.2
Other
Tyre appearance
4.2
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
4.2
peecee
3.8
Fantastic value. Hold out for that width. I do not know if that ESP has also had an impact. The car was quiet. When I was waiting for winter tires I then founded the "summer comfort" ride on the tyrech. I recommend! I already met, but little to the right. State. Change the tires front to back - more pośmigasz. Disadvantage? After the changes, you must buy all.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4.2
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4.2
Bump absorption
4.2
Other
Tyre appearance
3.4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
4.2
MC
3.8
Very good rubber. Too quickly lose traction on wet during dynamic startup. At this price, I would recommend P9000.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4.2
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4.2
Bump absorption
5.0
Other
Tyre appearance
2.6
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
3.4
Mariusz
3.8
Interesting observation. Four companies in our cars equipped with Bridgestone ER 300 Index H - 210 kmh but due to the approval of the manufacturer (larger engine capacity) in the next two cars were equipped with V-index 240 kmh J Tire I recently spoke with a mechanical engineer from the Technical University of Gdansk Department, which could explain the differences in the construction of the H index tires and V. When the wheel speed increases, for example, twice the inertial force acting on the tire increases four times "in the square of the speed." So you need to design better materials, more folds. The conclusion is the next, with the index V tire folds over is more rigid than the index of H. The second observation tire, the higher the speed rating, the required building increases the rolling resistance of tires. On the road s is in fact proved to be the index of H is a softer tire, we get a better comfort. Having traveled the distance of 28 miles. within the last year and installation of tires in the current season, we don ' have no objection. As for tires with a rolling resistance V is difficult for me to judge.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4.2
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
3.4
Bump absorption
3.4
Other
Tyre appearance
3.4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
3.4
Tadeusz
3.8
I bought vehicles, tires in good condition, especially on wet nawieszchni. Certainly better than the 9000 Dunlop.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.4
The grip on wet surface
4.2
Driving comfort
Noise level
3.4
Bump absorption
3.4
Other
Tyre appearance
2.6
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
3.4
ws
3.8
opny after 30,000 to throw, I would caution money
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
2.6
The grip on wet surface
5.0
Driving comfort
Noise level
2.6
Bump absorption
2.6
Other
Tyre appearance
2.6
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
2.6
Feathering, durability
2.6
jedrek
3.8
I bought the car 50,000 miles km away. noise is killing me these tires. At first I thought the race to replace the bearings in the car. Now tires can have the. 3 mm and the receiver and out with me so I mentioned the placenta suggests Previously, I Michelin mtx on the Fiesta and also had 80,000, but incomparably less noise and somehow stick to the road better (develop better koleinom resistance). Now I do dunlpow precursor SP 01 sport and I have no idea what to expect
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4.2
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
1.8
Bump absorption
2.6
Other
Tyre appearance
4.2
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
2.6
Feathering, durability
3.4
Coach
3.8
My worst life choice ... 25tys first. km was ok, it was only later that the tragedy. They work so hard that you can not drive safely! Horribly loud! the tires are defective .... pity that not even a strong one-year warranty ... worse than embarrassment for Toyota, which is in this situation, washing hands I did not recognize that there was a fault (reliability statistics may not be as great as other toyota not I admit fault ) I wish zeczywistość is different! People do not buy this crap .... waste of time and money nerves ....
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4.2
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
1.0
Bump absorption
1.0
Other
Tyre appearance
3.4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
1.8
Feathering, durability
1.8
coolmobil
3.6
These have tyres of April 2011. Conti actually hunted for sport, but for lack of other options vest. Tire in road works decently, although I think it is strong enough. Requires warm most severe turn. Leave the wet, in my opinion, the drama - not a patch on the second Conti Sport Another thing that I have a heavy foot and drive my car to the front has more than 400 Nm Overall, a decent tire, but strikes on his knees.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.9
The grip on wet surface
3.2
Driving comfort
Noise level
2.6
Bump absorption
3.4
Other
Tyre appearance
1.8
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
3.4
vengador
3.6
Welcome. My tyre size is 195/50R15, Honda Civic 3d 1998. Tyres were fitted on the front. I do not recommend on wheels with a width of less than 6.5 inches. I have 5,5 and it's a match! Benefits - tyre stops on the line for both, dry and wet! There is no problem in the ruts, erases water better than winter tyres. They are really comfortable. Better than: ToyoT1R, Falken 512 and 912, 185/60R14 Yokohama C drive Cons - terrible on the corners - it is their biggest drawback, in my opinion. Overall Rating 4, I recommend to people who drive safely and who want to have a quality tyre with an excellent wet and dry breaking. I do not recommend for high-speed corners.
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Honda Civic V 1.5i
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.6
The grip on wet surface
3.6
Driving comfort
Noise level
1.0
Bump absorption
4.2
Other
Tyre appearance
3.4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
2.3
Feathering, durability
2.6
23
24
25
Total rating of the tyre
4.3
Comfort
3.8
Road
4.2
Off-road
-
Cost
3.7
Buy