Bridgestone ER300 - User reviews

Sort:
ŁUCZAK
3.4
Previously mounted on Goodyear tires and in my humble opinion górą.I am Bridgestony fully satisfied, I recommend

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
Tomek
3.3
If someone is looking for tires for a quiet ride around the city, you can buy with confidence and be happy. The tire is quite difficult, consumes very slowly. I do not recommend if you like poupalać. The tragedy is not there, but definitely worth buying something better. Keep quite predictable, there is a sudden loss of grip and it's praises, even in the rain - I would say it is one that is designed to run in the rain tire. I flew around the 150km/hw literally a wall of rain and I had no soul on his shoulder, good to drive.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:Honda Civic Hatchback VI 1.6 16V
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability5
lucco
3.2
I do not understand why they have such a high score. Very noisy on dry tires, but wielding great. In the wet is the drama.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:Honda Accord Sedan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface5
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
coolmobil
3.2
These have tyres of April 2011. Conti actually hunted for sport, but for lack of other options vest. Tire in road works decently, although I think it is strong enough. Requires warm most severe turn. Leave the wet, in my opinion, the drama - not a patch on the second Conti Sport Another thing that I have a heavy foot and drive my car to the front has more than 400 Nm Overall, a decent tire, but strikes on his knees.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance2
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Volvo V50
3.1
I've had Michelin HP and ContiSportContact3 two were much better, much better stability when driving over 170 km / h Adhesion to dry or better for more aggressive starts with 1 and 2 are able to activate the system . The worst thing about these tires is that the depreciation of the inequality is horrible! rubber is hard as concrete, driving comfort is tragic (excluding motorways). When you want to get rid of the gum. I bought tempted by the price promotion as a sale, and unfortunately, it was preferable to make a better gum. 205/50/17 tires

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Volvo V50 Kombi I 2.0 D
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption1
Other
Tyre appearance-
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
mateo
3.0
Generally an average tyre, for a lot of money. Much better to choose Continental. Much cheaper and much better handling. Somehow it works on dry asphalt, there is a tragedy on wet, there is no question of any stronger braking, ABS works immediately, even when you lightly touch the brake pedal. The same with acceleration - on dry road stays, on wet asphalt, stronger gas pressure and wheels lose traction, unfortunately. When cornering, it starts throwing away quite early and you have to keep that in mind. Where, although on winter tires I enter calmly at corners at a speed of 90 km / h, on Brigestone it is unfortunately 75 km / h, a maximum of 80.

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Toyota Avensis Sedan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability4
vengador
3.0
Welcome. My tyre size is 195/50R15, Honda Civic 3d 1998. Tyres were fitted on the front. I do not recommend on wheels with a width of less than 6.5 inches. I have 5,5 and it's a match! Benefits - tyre stops on the line for both, dry and wet! There is no problem in the ruts, erases water better than winter tyres. They are really comfortable. Better than: ToyoT1R, Falken 512 and 912, 185/60R14 Yokohama C drive Cons - terrible on the corners - it is their biggest drawback, in my opinion. Overall Rating 4, I recommend to people who drive safely and who want to have a quality tyre with an excellent wet and dry breaking. I do not recommend for high-speed corners.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:Honda Civic V 1.5i
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability3
luk
2.6
Tires got with the car from the factory. Previously, most of the time mounted on the GY excellence. The tire is good stops on dry pavement, holding properly in the corners, the important thing right torque when overtaking. Nothing special what you can expect from tires and at the same time so I could say goodbye to it. Disadvantages: Powerful! For GY Excelancow not even compair which is even stronger than the winter gripow Ultra is total defeat AQUAPLANNINGU CHAMPION! 1.5 ton car with three people on board with a thin layer of water on the asphalt is already drifting speed 100-110 km / h embarrassment. Summative: Zedra the trash as soon as you can and look for another. Or are performed on summer zeson southern Europe.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:fast and aggressive
Vehicle:VW Passat 3C
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
RN
2.6
I bought based on the ADAC test. Tires were very good when they were new. Seemed to be perfect. Unfortunately, many road and it turned out they were the fastest overlapping tires I had. With abrasion began to deteriorate, of course, its performance. At this point, I start "wear" on the wet, and the labels are a little lacking. Generally recommended for people who drive a car only in "Sunday activist" and for those who drive a lot, but they can afford the annual purchase of new tires.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:Skoda Octavia
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability1
Sławek
2.6
25000 km and replace the front and rear, I do not know how much force, because it is only slightly better. Similar course in driving Michelin Energy Saver similar official profile and can not see signs of wear

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000km
Place of use:in terrain
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:Opel Omega 2,2 kombi
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Total rating of the tyre
3.9
3.8
4.2
-
3.7
Buy