Opening
and closing this menu:
Ctrl
+
M
Go to main menu
Go to footer
Go to sitemap
Check order status
01 699 4151
01 699 4151
Phones off
Click if you
live in UK
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Snow chains
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Michelin Tyres
Bridgestone Tyres
Continental Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
TPMS pressure sensors
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Contrast
Oponeo
Rating and Reviews
Tyre Reviews Bridgestone ER300
Bridgestone ER300 - User reviews
24
25
26
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
MK
3.4
I have traveled five seasons on the tire. At first it was ok. Over time, however, it was getting worse on wet. A wet tire can suddenly lose traction without notice (e.g. when cornering). I had 2-3 unpleasant situations because of this. The older the tyre, the slower I had to ride in the wet (even if it was only a little wet and not heavy rainfall). On dry I have no objections. In contrast, such sudden and unexpected loss of grip on wet roads definitely discourage me from buying it again. The tyre likes to be warmed up - it stays better on wet during longer aggressive driving - unfortunately you never know when you will cross this border and land in a ditch. In the rain, it is recommended for really calm drivers.
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
Honda Civic Hatchback VIII 1.8 (103kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5.0
The grip on wet surface
1.8
Driving comfort
Noise level
4.2
Bump absorption
3.4
Other
Tyre appearance
-
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4.2
Feathering, durability
4.2
lucco
3.4
I do not understand why they have such a high score. Very noisy on dry tires, but wielding great. In the wet is the drama.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
Honda Accord Sedan
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5.0
The grip on wet surface
1.8
Driving comfort
Noise level
1.8
Bump absorption
3.4
Other
Tyre appearance
3.4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3.9
Feathering, durability
4.2
RN
3.4
I bought based on the ADAC test. Tires were very good when they were new. Seemed to be perfect. Unfortunately, many road and it turned out they were the fastest overlapping tires I had. With abrasion began to deteriorate, of course, its performance. At this point, I start "wear" on the wet, and the labels are a little lacking. Generally recommended for people who drive a car only in "Sunday activist" and for those who drive a lot, but they can afford the annual purchase of new tires.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain + in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Skoda Octavia
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4.2
The grip on wet surface
2.6
Driving comfort
Noise level
5.0
Bump absorption
4.2
Other
Tyre appearance
3.4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
1.8
Feathering, durability
1.0
Maciej Nowicki
3.4
Very good tire. Car holds the road well, no squeaks and skidding around corners. Good price. I bought the car as a second set of five. I recommend.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
Toyota Avensis
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.4
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
3.4
Bump absorption
4.2
Other
Tyre appearance
3.4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
3.4
KW
3.4
Tires not recommend. Comfort fatal - especially for holes. In addition, are very noisy. A much better Klebery are 2x cheaper! I do not know what people in the audience. Marketing, however, is sound. Very not regret this purchase.
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
fast and aggressive
Vehicle:
Audi A6
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.4
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
1.0
Bump absorption
1.0
Other
Tyre appearance
4.2
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
1.8
Feathering, durability
3.4
kk
3.4
Tires do not impress. At this size - noisy and not very comfortable. As performed safely, but ...
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
5000 - 10000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.4
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
1.8
Bump absorption
2.6
Other
Tyre appearance
3.4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
2.6
Feathering, durability
3.4
mamut56
3.4
Volume increases with the course, but it is probably the result of the teeth, which is caused by a defect Toyota suspended-known problem, so that the new models for greater visibility (55) and rightly . Tire generally recommended, much better than originally used Dunlop
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.4
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4.2
Bump absorption
4.2
Other
Tyre appearance
4.2
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
3.4
tomek
3.4
noise can not talk in the car! do not buy!
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain + in the city
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.4
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
1.0
Bump absorption
1.0
Other
Tyre appearance
2.6
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
3.4
Slawomir
3.4
Auto Aug. well maintained, nicely thirteen terribly expensive, but noisy! The first impression that the bearings to replace? I hope you dotrą29
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000km
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.4
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
1.8
Bump absorption
3.4
Other
Tyre appearance
1.8
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
3.4
Feathering, durability
3.4
Andrzej
3.4
Theoretically, good tires, but after 35000 km. total consumption. Gave no information on the planned route of the technical service experts me. More not buy this quality
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000km
Place of use:
in terrain
Driving style:
calm
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
3.4
The grip on wet surface
3.4
Driving comfort
Noise level
2.6
Bump absorption
3.4
Other
Tyre appearance
2.6
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
1.0
Feathering, durability
1.0
24
25
26
Total rating of the tyre
4.3
Comfort
3.8
Road
4.2
Off-road
-
Cost
3.7
Buy